By In the world of motorcycles, the TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 are two popular choices that attract many riders. Both bikes have their unique features and specifications, making it essential to compare them to see which one offers better value for money. This article will break down various aspects, including price, performance, design, and user reviews, to help you decide which bike might be the best fit for you.
Key Takeaways
The TVS Ronin is priced lower than the Royal Enfield Hunter 350, making it a more affordable option.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Ronin outperforms the Hunter, offering better mileage.
Both bikes come in a variety of colors, appealing to different style preferences.
User ratings show a slight edge for the Hunter 350, but both bikes have received positive feedback.
The Ronin is lighter and may be easier to handle for new riders compared to the heavier Hunter 350.
Price Comparison
Ex-Showroom Prices
The ex-showroom prices for the two bikes are as follows:
Bike Model | Ex-Showroom Price |
|---|---|
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | ₹1,49,900 |
TVS Ronin | ₹1,35,073 |
On-Road Prices
When considering on-road prices, the costs can vary based on location and additional fees. However, generally:
Royal Enfield Hunter 350: Approximately ₹1,70,000
TVS Ronin: Approximately ₹1,50,000
Value for Money
Both bikes offer unique features for their price points. Here are some points to consider:
Royal Enfield Hunter 350: Known for its classic design and strong brand heritage.
TVS Ronin: Offers modern features and a competitive price, making it appealing for younger riders.
In the end, the choice between these two bikes often comes down to personal preference and riding style.
Engine Performance
Power and Torque
Both the TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 are designed to deliver impressive power and torque for city riding. The Ronin’s engine produces a peak torque of 27 Nm at 4,000 rpm, while the Hunter offers 19.93 Nm at 3,750 rpm. This means the Ronin has a slight edge in pulling power, especially at higher RPMs.
Engine Specifications
Specification | TVS Ronin | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Oil Cooled | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke, Air & Oil Cooled |
Displacement (cc) | 225.9 | 349.34 |
Max Power (bhp) | 20.2 @ 6,100 rpm | 20.4 @ 6,100 rpm |
Gearbox | 5 Speed | 5 Speed |
Compression Ratio | 10.14 ± 0.5 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Efficiency
TVS Ronin: 42.95 kmpl (city)
Royal Enfield Hunter 350: 36.2 kmpl (overall)
Conclusion
Both bikes have their strengths in engine performance. The Ronin is quicker in acceleration tests, while the Hunter offers a more relaxed ride at higher speeds.
Design and Aesthetics
Visual Appeal
When it comes to looks, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has a clean and simple design that many find appealing. It has a balanced shape and avoids any overly complicated details. In contrast, the TVS Ronin stands out with its unique features like a funky LED headlamp and a gold USD fork. However, the Ronin appears larger due to its wider fuel tank and thicker front suspension.
Build Quality
Both bikes are built well, but they have different feels. The Hunter is lower and slimmer, making it easier for newer or smaller riders to handle. The Ronin, while larger, has some odd design choices, like an oversized chain cover that seems out of place. Still, it offers stylish elements like adjustable levers and cool LED indicators.
Color Options
Both bikes come in various colors:
Royal Enfield Hunter 350: Factory Black, Lightning Black
TVS Ronin: Multiple vibrant options available
The design of a bike can greatly influence a rider’s experience. A well-thought-out design not only looks good but also enhances comfort and usability.
Ride and Handling
Comfort and Ergonomics
Both the TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 offer decent comfort, but the Ronin has a slight edge. The seat design and foot peg placement on the Ronin make it more comfortable for longer rides. However, neither bike excels in pillion comfort, which is something to consider if you often ride with a passenger.
Suspension Setup
The suspension systems of both bikes are designed for different riding experiences:
TVS Ronin:
Front: Telescopic, 41mm forks with 130mm travel
Rear: Monoshock with 7-step adjustable preload
Royal Enfield Hunter 350:
Front: Upside-down forks
Rear: Twin tube emulsion shock absorbers with 6-step adjustable preload
City and Highway Performance
When it comes to handling, the Hunter feels more connected and fun to ride. In contrast, the Ronin is lighter and easier to maneuver, but its front end may not provide as much feedback. Here’s a quick comparison of their performance:
Feature | TVS Ronin | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
Kerb Weight (kg) | 177 | 159 |
Ground Clearance (mm) | 150 | 181 |
Wheelbase (mm) | 1370 | 1357 |
Braking Distance (60-0 km/h) | 21.29 m | 17.29 m |
In summary, while both bikes have their strengths, the choice between them will depend on your riding style and preferences. The Ronin is great for city rides, while the Hunter shines on highways.
Features and Technology
Instrument Cluster
The instrument cluster of both bikes offers a mix of digital and analogue displays. The TVS Ronin features a fully digital console, while the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has a semi-digital setup. Here’s a quick comparison:
Feature | TVS Ronin | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
Speedometer | Digital | Analogue |
Odometer | Digital | Digital |
Tripmeter | Digital | Digital |
Fuel Gauge | Digital | Digital |
Additional Features | Yes | Yes |
Lighting and Electricals
Both bikes come equipped with modern lighting systems. The TVS Ronin uses LED lights for better visibility, while the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has a mix of halogen and LED lights. Key features include:
Daytime Running Lights (DRLs)
USB charging ports for convenience
Hazard warning lights for safety
Additional Features
Both bikes offer unique features that enhance the riding experience:
TVS Ronin: SmartXonnect, Voice and Ride Assist
Royal Enfield Hunter 350: Riding modes for different conditions
Both bikes have a service due indicator to remind you of maintenance
In summary, both bikes offer a range of features that cater to different rider preferences. The choice between them may depend on whether you prioritize advanced technology or classic styling.
User Reviews and Ratings
Overall Ratings
Bike Model | Average Rating | Number of Reviews |
|---|---|---|
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | 4.7/5 | 1586 |
TVS Ronin | 4.6/5 | 431 |
Common Praises
Comfortable ride: Many users appreciate the comfort level of both bikes, making them suitable for long journeys.
Stylish design: Riders often mention the attractive looks of both models, with the Hunter 350 being noted for its classic appeal.
Good performance: Users highlight the performance and handling of both bikes, especially in city traffic.
Common Complaints
Break issues: Some riders of the TVS Ronin have reported needing improvements in the braking system.
Engine overheating: A few users have mentioned overheating problems with the Ronin, which can be a concern during long rides.
Service experience: While most reviews are positive, some users have expressed dissatisfaction with the service experience for both bikes.
Overall, both bikes have received positive feedback from users, but they also have areas that could use improvement. Riders should consider their personal needs and preferences when choosing between the two.
Maintenance and Service
Service Intervals
Both the TVS Ronin and Royal Enfield Hunter 350 have specific service intervals that help keep the bikes in top shape. Here’s a quick look:
Bike Model | Free Services | Distance (Kms) / Time (Days) |
|---|---|---|
TVS Ronin | 4 Free Services | 15,000 Kms / 540 Days |
Royal Enfield Hunter 350 | 3 Free Services | 11,500 – 12,000 Kms / 365 Days |
Cost of Maintenance
Regular maintenance is crucial for bike longevity. Here are some key points to consider:
TVS Ronin generally has lower maintenance costs compared to Royal Enfield.
Parts for the TVS Ronin are often more readily available.
Royal Enfield may have higher costs due to its brand heritage and specialized parts.
Availability of Spare Parts
When it comes to spare parts, both brands have their strengths:
TVS Ronin: Parts are widely available and often more affordable.
Royal Enfield: While parts may be pricier, they are also known for their durability and quality.
Regular maintenance not only ensures safety but also enhances the riding experience. Keeping up with service schedules can save you money in the long run.
Brand Value and Heritage
Royal Enfield’s Legacy
Royal Enfield has a long history, dating back to 1901. It is known for its classic designs and strong heritage. The brand is often associated with ruggedness and adventure, making it a favorite among motorcycle enthusiasts.
TVS’s Market Position
TVS, established in 1911, has built a reputation for reliability and innovation. It focuses on providing value for money and has a strong presence in the Indian market. TVS bikes are often praised for their performance and affordability.
Brand Loyalty
Both brands have loyal followings:
Royal Enfield: Attracts riders who appreciate classic styling and a sense of adventure.
TVS: Appeals to those looking for modern features and dependable performance.
In the world of motorcycles, brand loyalty often influences purchasing decisions, as riders tend to stick with what they know and trust.
Final Verdict
Which Bike Offers Better Value?
When comparing the TVS Ronin and the Royal Enfield Hunter 350, the Ronin stands out as the better value option. It offers a range of features that enhance the riding experience, making it a more practical choice for many riders. Here’s a quick comparison:
Feature | TVS Ronin | Royal Enfield Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
Ex-Showroom Price | ₹ 1,35,073 | ₹ 1,49,900 |
Overall User Rating | 4.7/5 | 4.6/5 |
Fuel Efficiency (km/l) | 35 | 30 |
Who Should Buy the Royal Enfield Hunter 350?
Riders who value heritage and brand prestige.
Those looking for a bike with a more characterful engine.
Individuals who prefer a classic design and feel.
Who Should Buy the TVS Ronin?
Riders seeking a bike with modern features and technology.
Those who prioritize comfort and ease of handling.
Individuals looking for better fuel efficiency and lower costs.
In conclusion, while both bikes have their strengths, the TVS Ronin offers a more comprehensive package for the price, making it a smart choice for budget-conscious riders.
Final Thoughts
In the end, both the TVS Ronin and the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 have their own strengths. The Ronin is cheaper and offers better mileage, making it a great choice for those who want to save money. On the other hand, the Hunter 350 has a more powerful engine and a classic look that many riders love. If you want a bike that is easy to ride and good for city use, the Ronin might be the better pick. But if you prefer style and a strong engine, the Hunter 350 could be the way to go. Ultimately, it comes down to what you value more in a bike.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which bike is better, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 or the TVS Ronin?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 has a slightly higher user rating at 4.3 out of 5, while the TVS Ronin has a rating of 4.2 out of 5.
Which bike is more affordable, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 or the TVS Ronin?
The TVS Ronin is the cheaper option, priced at ₹1,35,000 compared to the Royal Enfield Hunter 350, which costs ₹1,49,900.
Which bike offers better fuel efficiency?
The TVS Ronin has better mileage at around 40 kmpl, while the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 offers around 35 kmpl.
Which bike is heavier, the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 or the TVS Ronin?
The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 is heavier at 177 kg, whereas the TVS Ronin weighs 159 kg.
How do the engines compare in terms of power?
Both bikes have similar power outputs, with the Hunter 350 producing 20.4 PS and the Ronin also at 20.4 PS, but the torque differs.
What are the color options for each bike?
Both the Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and the TVS Ronin come in 8 different colors.
Which bike is better for city riding?
The TVS Ronin is often considered better for city riding due to its lighter weight and agility.
What do users generally say about these bikes?
Users generally praise the comfort and style of both bikes, but some mention that the Royal Enfield has a more classic feel.