In the world of motorcycles, the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 stand out as two popular choices for riders who appreciate style and performance. Both bikes offer unique features, but how do they compare in terms of design, power, and price? This article dives into a detailed comparison to help you decide which bike suits your needs better.
Both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 embrace a retro design that appeals to classic motorcycle enthusiasts. The Hunter 350 features a sleek silhouette with a modern twist, while the Jawa 42 showcases a vintage charm with its round headlight and teardrop fuel tank. These design choices make both bikes stand out on the road.
When it comes to color choices, the Hunter 350 offers a variety of vibrant options, including:
On the other hand, the Jawa 42 provides a more subdued palette with:
Both motorcycles are built with high-quality materials, ensuring durability and longevity. Here’s a quick comparison:
| Feature | Hunter 350 | Jawa 42 |
|---|---|---|
| Frame Material | Steel | Steel |
| Finish | Premium Paint | Glossy Finish |
| Weight | 181 kg | 194 kg |
Both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 feature single-cylinder engines, but they differ in displacement and design. Here’s a quick comparison:
| Feature | Hunter 350 | Jawa 42 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine Type | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke | Single Cylinder, 4 Stroke |
| Displacement | 348.36 cc | 334 cc |
| Max Power | 21.07 PS @ 5500 rpm | 22.5 PS @ 8000 rpm |
| Max Torque | 30 Nm @ 3000 rpm | 28.2 Nm |
| Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
The Hunter 350 delivers a solid performance with a maximum power of 21.07 PS, while the Jawa 42 slightly edges ahead with 22.5 PS. This difference in power can be felt during acceleration and overall ride experience.
Torque is crucial for a bike’s performance, especially during city rides. The Hunter 350 offers a torque of 30 Nm, which provides a smooth ride in urban conditions. In contrast, the Jawa 42 has a torque of 28.2 Nm, making it slightly less powerful in low-speed scenarios.
Both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 come with unique suspension systems that affect their ride quality. The Hunter 350 features a telescopic front fork and dual shock absorbers at the rear, providing a smooth ride over bumps. In contrast, the Jawa 42 uses a similar setup but with slightly different tuning, which can lead to a firmer feel on rough roads. Riders often prefer the Hunter for its comfort during long rides.
When it comes to stopping power, both bikes are equipped with disc brakes on the front and rear. Here’s a quick comparison:
| Feature | Hunter 350 | Jawa 42 |
|---|---|---|
| Front Brake Diameter | 310 mm | 320 mm |
| Rear Brake Diameter | 240 mm | 240 mm |
| ABS | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
Both bikes offer reliable braking, but the Hunter 350 is noted for its slightly better feedback during emergency stops.
Riding comfort is crucial for any motorcycle. Here are some points to consider:
The instrument cluster on both bikes combines analogue and digital displays. The speedometer shows your current speed in km/h or mph, which is essential for safe riding. Here’s a quick look at the features:
| Feature | Hunter 350 | Jawa 42 |
|---|---|---|
| Speedometer | Analogue | Analogue |
| Trip Meter | Digital | Analogue |
| Odometer | Digital | Analogue |
| USB Charging Port | No | Yes |
| Clock | Yes | Yes |
| Fuel Gauge | Digital | Digital |
Both bikes come equipped with modern lighting systems:
Safety is a priority for both models, featuring:
Both bikes offer a blend of classic design and modern technology, making them appealing to a wide range of riders.
The ex-showroom prices for the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 are as follows:
| Model | Ex-Showroom Price |
|---|---|
| Hunter 350 | ₹1.49 Lakh |
| Jawa 42 | ₹1.72 Lakh |
When considering the on-road prices, which include additional costs like registration and insurance, the figures are:
| Model | On-Road Price |
|---|---|
| Hunter 350 | ₹1.70 Lakh |
| Jawa 42 | ₹1.90 Lakh |
Both bikes offer unique features and performance, but here are some points to consider:
In the end, choosing between the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 comes down to personal preference and budget. Consider what features matter most to you!
Both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 offer competitive mileage figures, making them appealing choices for riders looking to save on fuel costs. Here’s a quick comparison:
| Model | Mileage (kmpl) |
|---|---|
| Hunter 350 | 30 |
| Jawa 42 | 29.5 |
The fuel tank capacity is crucial for long rides. Here’s how they stack up:
| Model | Fuel Tank Capacity (liters) |
|---|---|
| Hunter 350 | 15 |
| Jawa 42 | 12 |
In real-world conditions, riders have reported varying mileage based on riding style and terrain. Here are some insights:
Fuel efficiency is not just about numbers; it’s about how far you can go on a single tank, making both bikes great for daily commutes and weekend getaways.
The weight of a motorcycle can greatly affect its handling and performance. The Jawa 350 has a kerb weight of 194 kg, while the Hunter 350 weighs slightly more at 195 kg. This small difference can influence how each bike feels on the road.
Seat height is important for rider comfort and accessibility. The Jawa 350 has a seat height of 802 mm, making it suitable for a variety of riders. In comparison, the Hunter 350 has a seat height of 805 mm, which is just a bit taller.
Ground clearance is crucial for navigating rough terrain. The Jawa 350 offers a ground clearance of 178 mm, while the Hunter 350 provides 170 mm. This means the Jawa can handle bumps and obstacles slightly better than the Hunter.
| Feature | Jawa 350 | Hunter 350 |
|---|---|---|
| Kerb Weight | 194 kg | 195 kg |
| Seat Height | 802 mm | 805 mm |
| Ground Clearance | 178 mm | 170 mm |
Understanding the dimensions and weight of these bikes can help you choose the one that fits your riding style and comfort needs.
Many riders have shared their thoughts on the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42. Here are some highlights:
While both bikes have their strengths, some users pointed out areas for improvement:
In general, users are quite satisfied with their purchases. Here’s a quick summary of ratings:
| Bike Model | Average Rating |
|---|---|
| Jawa 42 | 4.5 |
| Hunter 350 | 4.3 |
Overall, both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 have carved a niche for themselves in the market, appealing to riders who value style and performance.
Both Hunter and Jawa have rich histories in the motorcycle world. Jawa, originally from Czechoslovakia, has been known for its classic designs and strong performance since the 1920s. In contrast, Hunter, a newer player, draws inspiration from traditional styles while incorporating modern technology.
The legacy of these brands shapes their identity, influencing how riders perceive their motorcycles.
Both the Hunter 350 and Jawa 42 offer a range of accessories to enhance your riding experience. Here are some popular options:
Riders can personalize their bikes in various ways:
Both brands have a strong aftermarket presence, providing:
Customizing your bike not only makes it unique but also enhances your riding experience. Explore the options available to find what suits you best!
Regular maintenance is key to keeping your bike in top shape. Here are the typical service intervals for both bikes:
| Service Type | Hunter 350 | Jawa 42 |
|---|---|---|
| First Service | 500 km | 500 km |
| Subsequent Service | Every 3,000 km | Every 3,000 km |
| Major Service | Every 10,000 km | Every 10,000 km |
The cost of maintenance can vary based on location and service provider. Here’s a rough estimate:
Both brands have a decent service network, but there are some differences:
Regular maintenance not only ensures safety but also enhances the lifespan of your motorcycle. Keeping up with service schedules can save you money in the long run.
In the end, choosing between the Hunter 350 and the Jawa 42 comes down to what you value most in a motorcycle. If you want a bike that stands out with its unique design and solid performance, the Jawa 42 might be your best bet. On the other hand, if you prefer a more classic look with a reliable engine, the Hunter 350 could be the right choice for you. Both bikes offer great features and are priced competitively, making them excellent options for riders. Ultimately, it’s about finding the bike that fits your style and needs.
The Jawa 42 is priced at Rs. 1.98 lakh, making it a bit more expensive than the Hunter 350, which costs Rs. 1.49 lakh.
The Hunter 350 has a 349cc engine producing 20.2bhp, while the Jawa 42 features a 334cc engine that generates 22.5bhp.
The Hunter 350 offers better mileage than the Jawa 42, with the Hunter achieving around 35 kmpl and the Jawa around 30 kmpl.
The Hunter 350 comes in several colors, including black and green, while the Jawa 42 is available in maroon, black, and a new orange.
The Hunter 350 has a dual-channel ABS braking system, which is considered safer than the single-channel ABS found in the Jawa 42.
Both bikes offer good comfort, but many users find the Jawa 42 slightly more comfortable for longer rides due to its seat design.
The Hunter 350 weighs about 177 kg, while the Jawa 42 is slightly heavier at 182 kg.
Overall, users give both bikes good ratings, with the Hunter 350 often praised for its price and the Jawa 42 for its performance.
When it comes to new buzz around the automotive world, Maruti Suzuki is setting up…
News that Toyota is preparing for the next generation Camry India unveiling on December 11,…
Here is the 2024 Maruti Dzire a compact sedan that is taking the concept of…
Czech automaker Skoda is making inroads in the Indian automotive market with possible entry into…
The Indian automotive landscape is rapidly evolving, and at its forefront is Škoda Auto Volkswagen…
Excitement is building in the automotive world as Audi India readies for its launch of…